TaylorMade SpeedSoft vs Callaway Supersoft: Which Soft Golf Ball Is Better?

Posted by on | Featured

If you want an affordable golf ball that feels extremely soft, two models are almost guaranteed to appear on your shortlist:

TaylorMade SpeedSoft

and

Callaway Supersoft.

Both are aimed primarily at recreational golfers.

Both use simple two-piece constructions.

Both prioritise:

  • Soft feel
  • Low driver spin
  • Easy distance
  • Durability
  • Affordable pricing

And both cost considerably less than premium urethane balls such as TaylorMade TP5, Callaway Chrome Tour or Titleist Pro V1.

That makes the comparison look straightforward.

But there are some important differences.

Independent robot testing suggests that Callaway Supersoft can produce slightly more driver speed and very strong distance at slower swing speeds, while TaylorMade SpeedSoft produces an exceptionally soft sensation and offers one of the most distinctive visual options in golf through its SpeedSoft Ink designs.

Neither ball, however, is particularly strong when maximum greenside spin is required.

So the real choice isn’t:

Which golf ball is better?

It is:

Which combination of speed, feel, flight, price and short-game control fits your game better?

If you’re comparing other models as well, you can visit our complete collection of golf ball reviews.

But if your decision has come down to TaylorMade SpeedSoft vs Callaway Supersoft, this comparison will help you choose.

SpeedSoft vs Supersoft: Quick Answer

Choose the TaylorMade SpeedSoft if you prioritise:

  • Exceptionally soft feel
  • A very muted sensation
  • Low driver spin
  • Good iron distance
  • Excellent durability
  • SpeedSoft Ink visual designs
  • Slightly lower purchase price
  • Fun visual personality

Choose the Callaway Supersoft if you prioritise:

  • Very soft feel
  • Slightly stronger ball-speed performance
  • Excellent low-swing-speed driver distance
  • High iron distance at moderate speeds
  • A huge range of colour and visual options
  • Proven popularity
  • Slightly more conventional all-around performance

Our simplest verdict:

SpeedSoft = softer-feeling personality and style

Supersoft = marginally stronger overall distance case

Neither provides premium urethane-level greenside spin.

TaylorMade SpeedSoft vs Callaway Supersoft Specs At A Glance

SpecificationTaylorMade SpeedSoftCallaway Supersoft
Construction2-piece2-piece
CorePWRCOREHyperElastic SoftFast Core
CoverIonomerHybrid / ionomer-based cover
CompressionSub-50Low compression
FeelExtremely softExtremely soft
Driver SpinLowVery low
Iron DistanceLongVery long at some speeds
Greenside SpinLowLow
FlightMidGenerally low-to-mid
DurabilityExcellentExcellent
Visual OptionsWhite, Yellow, InkWhite, Yellow, Matte, Splatter 360
Typical US PriceAround $25/dozenAround $27/dozen
Best ForSoft-feel/value golfersSoft-feel/value golfers
Primary StrengthFeel + value + InkDistance + soft feel
Main WeaknessWedge spinWedge spin

The Most Important Similarity

Before concentrating on the differences, understand what these balls have in common.

Neither SpeedSoft nor Supersoft is trying to be:

  • TP5
  • Chrome Tour
  • Pro V1
  • Z-STAR

They occupy a completely different market.

Their mission is essentially:

Make golf enjoyable, affordable and comfortable for everyday golfers.

That means both prioritise:

  • Softness
  • Distance
  • Durability
  • Low spin
  • Price

rather than sophisticated Tour-level spin separation.

That is important because buyers sometimes compare them against $50–$60 urethane balls and conclude that the cheaper ball is “worse.”

That isn’t necessarily the right comparison.

A better question is:

Does the additional performance of a premium urethane ball matter enough to your game to justify paying twice as much?

For many recreational golfers, the answer may be no.

1. Construction: SpeedSoft vs Supersoft

Both are fundamentally:

two-piece golf balls.

That means each primarily consists of:

  1. A large core
  2. An outer cover

This simple construction has several advantages:

  • Lower manufacturing cost
  • Excellent durability
  • Low driver spin
  • Straightforward performance
  • Soft-feel potential

But it also limits how independently manufacturers can tune performance across different clubs.

A five-layer Tour ball can make driver behaviour substantially different from wedge behaviour.

A two-piece ball has fewer mechanical levers to manipulate.

That is one reason both SpeedSoft and Supersoft sacrifice some greenside spin.

2. TaylorMade SpeedSoft Core Technology

SpeedSoft uses TaylorMade’s:

PWRCORE

The core is designed around an unusual objective.

TaylorMade wanted to enter the sub-50 compression category while still producing useful ball speed.

That makes SpeedSoft one of the softest products TaylorMade has produced.

The core is relatively large and designed to deform easily at impact.

For many recreational golfers, this translates into:

  • Cushioned impact sensation
  • Soft iron feel
  • Muted sound
  • Comfortable putting feedback

TaylorMade’s engineering challenge was keeping the ball sufficiently fast despite that softness.

3. Callaway Supersoft Core Technology

Callaway’s current Supersoft uses its:

HyperElastic SoftFast Core

The engineering objective is similar.

Callaway wants to combine:

soft feel

with:

useful speed.

The modern Supersoft has been refined over numerous generations, making it one of the most established soft-ball platforms in golf.

Callaway specifically positions the current version around:

  • Increased ball speed
  • Extremely soft feel
  • Control
  • Spin throughout the bag

But—as we’ll see—the independent spin data adds important context to that last claim.

4. Which Ball Has Lower Compression?

TaylorMade provides the clearer specification.

SpeedSoft was designed as a:

sub-50 compression golf ball.

Callaway does not generally publish a simple official compression figure for Supersoft.

Both should nevertheless be considered:

very low-compression golf balls.

In practical terms, most golfers are unlikely to choose between them because one has a compression rating a few points lower than the other.

What matters more is:

  • Actual ball speed
  • Spin
  • Flight
  • Feel

5. Which Ball Feels Softer?

This is close.

Both are exceptionally soft.

But I would give a slight subjective edge to:

TaylorMade SpeedSoft.

Its entire product identity is built around pushing feel into an extremely soft range.

With:

  • Irons
  • Wedges
  • Putter

SpeedSoft produces a particularly muted, cushioned sensation.

Supersoft is also extremely soft, but often feels fractionally more responsive.

That could actually make Supersoft preferable for golfers who dislike a sensation they would describe as:

mushy.

Feel Comparison

ClubSpeedSoftSupersoft
DriverVery soft / mutedSoft / responsive
IronExtremely softVery soft
WedgeCushionedSoft
PutterVery mutedSoft / slightly livelier
OverallSoftestSoft with more feedback

Feel Winner:

TaylorMade SpeedSoft

But only if softer is what you want.

6. Driver Performance: Which Ball Is Faster?

This is where independent data becomes particularly useful.

Manufacturers naturally describe their own products as fast.

Robot testing gives us a way to compare them under identical conditions.

MyGolfSpy’s 2025 test produced the following driver ball-speed results:

Test SpeedTaylorMade SpeedSoftCallaway Supersoft
Fast162.39 mph163.02 mph
Mid146.46 mph146.89 mph
Slow122.76 mph122.81 mph

The differences are small.

But Supersoft was faster at all three driver test speeds.

That makes the data-based winner:

Callaway Supersoft

However, don’t exaggerate the difference.

At slow speed, the gap was only:

0.05 mph.

For most golfers, that is effectively negligible.

7. What Does That Ball-Speed Difference Mean?

It means Supersoft appears to retain speed slightly better within this soft-ball category.

It does not mean Supersoft is universally longer.

Distance depends on:

  • Ball speed
  • Launch
  • Spin
  • Aerodynamics
  • Peak height
  • Descent angle
  • Ground conditions

A ball with slightly less speed can sometimes travel farther if its launch conditions are more efficient.

So we need to look deeper.

8. Low-Swing-Speed Driver Distance

This is where Supersoft becomes particularly impressive.

In independent testing at approximately:

86 mph driver swing speed,

Supersoft finished very close to the longest golf ball tested.

Its total distance was approximately:

223.9 yards

versus roughly:

224.2 yards

for the category leader.

That is an excellent result.

It demonstrates something important:

soft golf balls are not automatically short for slow swingers.

At lower speeds, Supersoft’s combination of:

  • Sufficient ball speed
  • Low spin
  • Efficient flight

can produce excellent total distance.

9. What About SpeedSoft at Slow Swing Speeds?

SpeedSoft also performs well for its intended player.

Its exceptionally soft construction does not prevent it from generating useful driver speed.

And its low-spin profile can help provide:

  • Good rollout
  • Stable flight
  • Useful total distance

But based on independent testing, Supersoft currently makes the slightly stronger case if your priority is purely:

driver distance at slower swing speeds.

10. Winner Off the Driver

Ball Speed:

Callaway Supersoft

Low-Speed Total Distance:

Callaway Supersoft

Softest Driver Feel:

TaylorMade SpeedSoft

Low-Spin Performance:

Very close

Overall Driver Winner:

Callaway Supersoft – by a small margin.

11. Driver Spin

Both balls are low-spin products.

And that’s part of their appeal.

A recreational golfer producing too much spin can see drives:

  • Climb
  • Stall
  • Curve more
  • Lose rollout

Reducing unnecessary spin can improve total distance.

But there is an important warning:

lower is not always better.

Golfers with very low speed or very low dynamic loft still need sufficient spin to keep the ball airborne.

12. Which Spins Less Off the Driver?

Independent testing places Supersoft among the lowest-spinning golf balls available, particularly at slower speeds.

SpeedSoft is also low spinning.

The differences can vary by swing speed and strike, so I wouldn’t claim one will always spin a fixed number of RPM less.

Broadly:

SpeedSoft:

Low spin

Supersoft:

Very low spin

That gives Supersoft a slight edge if reducing driver spin is your priority.

13. Will Either Ball Reduce a Slice?

Possibly slightly.

But neither fixes a slice.

A slice primarily comes from the relationship between:

  • Clubface
  • Swing path
  • Strike

A lower-spin golf ball may reduce the magnitude of curvature in some situations because total spin is lower.

But if your face is dramatically open to your path:

both balls will still slice.

Think of low-spin golf balls as potentially reducing damage—not correcting swing mechanics.

14. Mid-Speed Iron Performance

Here’s where Supersoft produced a particularly interesting result.

In MyGolfSpy’s mid-speed iron testing, Supersoft finished almost at the top for total distance.

At approximately:

80 mph iron swing speed

it travelled around:

161 yards

and finished only about:

0.15 yards

behind the longest result.

That is outstanding distance for a low-compression ball.

15. Why Was Supersoft So Long With Mid Irons?

The answer appears largely tied to:

low spin.

Low-spin iron shots can travel farther because less energy goes into rotational movement and the ball may produce more forward distance.

But there is a trade-off.

The same test data flagged Supersoft’s extremely low spin as a potential:

stopping-power concern.

This is crucial.

A golf ball that travels farther with a 7-iron isn’t automatically better if it then:

lands and runs through the back of the green.

16. TaylorMade SpeedSoft Iron Performance

SpeedSoft also performs well for iron distance.

At lower swing speeds, independent testing found it among the higher-flying options within the group of longer golf balls.

At mid speeds, however, SpeedSoft demonstrated a relatively low flight.

So its flight characteristics can change substantially with speed.

That illustrates why golfers shouldn’t rely solely on manufacturer descriptions.

Your own delivery matters.

17. Iron Distance Winner

Based on the independent test evidence:

Callaway Supersoft

gets the edge for raw iron distance.

But this needs an asterisk.

If Supersoft produces:

  • Too little spin
  • Too shallow a descent angle
  • Too much rollout

then the shorter ball may actually perform better on the golf course.

18. Iron Stopping Power

This is where neither ball is outstanding.

Both are ionomer-based two-piece products.

That generally means lower spin than premium urethane alternatives.

Supersoft’s low iron spin can produce excellent distance but reduced stopping power.

SpeedSoft is also designed primarily around:

distance + softness

rather than maximum spin.

If you routinely play:

  • Firm greens
  • Elevated greens
  • Long approach shots

you may benefit from stepping up to a urethane-covered ball.

19. The 7-Iron Test You Should Perform

If comparing these balls yourself, don’t merely record carry distance.

Measure:

  • Ball speed
  • Launch
  • Spin
  • Peak height
  • Carry
  • Descent angle

Then ask:

Can I actually hold a green with this flight?

A ball that flies:

3 yards shorter

but lands much more steeply may be the better golf ball.

20. Short Game: Where Both Balls Make Their Biggest Compromise

This is perhaps the most important section in the comparison.

Neither SpeedSoft nor Supersoft is a high-spin short-game ball.

Independent 35-yard wedge testing demonstrates that clearly.

Supersoft produced approximately:

4,381 RPM

in MyGolfSpy’s 2025 test.

By comparison, the highest-spinning ball in that test generated over:

6,000 RPM.

That’s a substantial difference.

SpeedSoft also ranked near the bottom of the wedge-spin chart.

21. Why Are Both Low Spin Around the Green?

The main reason is:

cover material.

Premium Tour balls use soft urethane covers that interact aggressively with wedge grooves.

SpeedSoft and Supersoft use tougher ionomer-type cover constructions.

Ionomer is excellent for:

  • Speed
  • Durability
  • Price

but weaker for:

  • Low-launch wedge spin
  • Check
  • Bite
  • Partial-shot control

22. What Will You Notice on the Course?

With a urethane ball, a 35-yard pitch might:

land → check → stop.

With either SpeedSoft or Supersoft, you’re more likely to see:

land → bounce → release.

That doesn’t make them uncontrollable.

It simply means you need to plan for more rollout.

Golfers with a bump-and-run style may actually adapt very easily.

Players who rely heavily on one-hop-and-stop wedge shots may not.

23. Which Spins More Around the Green?

Neither dominates this category.

Supersoft is among the lowest-spinning products in independent testing.

SpeedSoft is also near the low end.

The exact winner can vary depending on test method and shot.

I would therefore call short-game spin:

essentially a draw.

Neither should be purchased if your priority is maximum greenside spin.

24. Short-Game Winner

Maximum spin:

Neither

Softest feel:

SpeedSoft

Slightly more responsive feel:

Supersoft

Overall:

Draw

If short-game control is your primary buying criterion, look beyond both.

25. Putting Feel

Both golf balls are very pleasant if you prefer soft putting feedback.

But they are not identical.

TaylorMade SpeedSoft With the Putter

Expect:

  • Very muted impact
  • Low-frequency sound
  • Cushioned sensation
  • Minimal click

Players using a firm milled face may love this.

Players already using a very soft insert may find it too muted.

Callaway Supersoft With the Putter

Supersoft is also extremely soft.

But it tends to provide a little more:

response.

That may make distance feedback slightly easier for golfers who dislike an ultra-muted ball.

Putting Winner

Maximum softness:

SpeedSoft

Slightly better feedback:

Supersoft

Overall:

Personal preference

26. SpeedSoft Ink vs Supersoft Visual Options

This is one area where things become fun.

Both manufacturers have recognised that recreational golfers don’t necessarily want:

plain white golf balls.

TaylorMade SpeedSoft Ink

SpeedSoft Ink uses irregular splash-style graphics distributed across the surface.

Depending on the version, you may see:

  • Blue
  • Green
  • Pink
  • Red
  • Multicoloured visual effects

The design is extremely distinctive.

It resembles:

paint splatter or street art.

That gives SpeedSoft one of the strongest visual identities in the value-ball category.

27. Does SpeedSoft Ink Have a Practical Purpose?

It can.

The graphics may help with:

  • Ball identification
  • Flight tracking
  • Visibility in rough
  • Visual feedback while putting

It is also simply enjoyable.

For golfers who want their equipment to have some personality:

SpeedSoft Ink is difficult to beat.

28. Callaway Supersoft Visual Range

Callaway takes a different approach.

Supersoft is available in an unusually wide range of styles, including:

  • White
  • Yellow
  • Matte Pink
  • Matte Orange
  • Matte Green
  • Matte Red
  • Splatter 360 patterns
  • Limited editions

Callaway regularly produces themed Supersoft designs as well.

So while SpeedSoft Ink may be more distinctive as a single design language, Supersoft offers:

more overall visual variety.

Visual Winner

Most distinctive design:

TaylorMade SpeedSoft Ink

Greatest variety:

Callaway Supersoft

Overall:

Draw

It depends on whether you want one striking visual identity or lots of different choices.

29. Visibility

Visibility varies enormously by golfer.

Some players see:

yellow

better than white.

Others find:

pink or orange

easier to track.

Splatter graphics can also help distinguish your ball from everyone else’s.

On this point, both products are excellent.

30. Durability

Both are strong.

The tough outer covers should withstand ordinary recreational play very well.

They are less prone to delicate cover damage than many thin urethane Tour balls.

Expect good resistance against:

  • Full wedge strikes
  • Bunker shots
  • Trees
  • General wear

Obviously no golf ball survives a direct cart-path strike completely unmarked.

But these are both practical, durable products.

Durability Winner

Draw

Both receive:

★★★★★

for their intended market.

31. Price: SpeedSoft vs Supersoft

Current US manufacturer pricing places the balls very close together.

TaylorMade SpeedSoft:

Approximately $25/dozen

Callaway Supersoft:

Approximately $27/dozen

Promotions can change those numbers.

Callaway, for example, sometimes offers multi-dozen promotions.

But at standard pricing:

SpeedSoft has a small advantage.

32. Does $2 Per Dozen Matter?

Not very much for an occasional golfer.

But consider someone playing:

50 rounds per year

and losing:

2 balls per round.

That’s roughly:

100 golf balls.

At that usage rate, even modest differences start adding up.

More importantly, both balls remain dramatically cheaper than premium Tour models.

33. Cost Per Lost Ball

At $25 per dozen:

approximately $2.08 per ball

At $27 per dozen:

approximately $2.25 per ball

Compare that with a $60 premium dozen:

$5 per ball.

Hit two into the lake and you’re looking at:

SpeedSoft:

About $4

Supersoft:

About $4.50

Premium Tour ball:

About $10

For golfers who lose multiple balls every round, that difference matters.

34. Which Is Better for Slow Swing Speeds?

This is one of the easiest categories to decide based on independent test data.

At low driver speed, Supersoft produced excellent total distance.

It finished almost at the top of the test.

Therefore:

Callaway Supersoft gets the advantage.

But SpeedSoft remains a strong choice if:

feel matters more than squeezing out every final yard.

35. Which Is Better Around 90 MPH?

This is closer.

At moderate speeds, Supersoft demonstrates:

  • Good ball speed
  • Excellent iron distance
  • Low spin

SpeedSoft provides:

  • Very soft feel
  • Low spin
  • Good distance

If distance is the priority:

Supersoft.

If softness is the priority:

SpeedSoft.

36. Which Is Better Above 100 MPH?

Neither would be my automatic recommendation.

Independent testing shows that soft balls generally surrender ball speed as speed rises.

At high driver speeds, firmer premium balls can gain substantial total distance.

Supersoft, for example, was more than 15 yards shorter than the longest Callaway ball in MyGolfSpy’s high-speed testing.

That doesn’t mean a high-speed golfer is forbidden from using Supersoft or SpeedSoft.

But if you’re swinging:

105–115+ mph

and performance is the priority, I would strongly compare them against:

  • TaylorMade TP5x
  • Callaway Chrome Tour
  • Callaway Chrome Tour X
  • Titleist Pro V1x
  • Srixon Z-STAR XV

You may be giving away performance purely to obtain softer feel.

37. Which Is Better for High Handicappers?

Both are excellent candidates.

High-handicap players often prioritise:

  • Price
  • Distance
  • Durability
  • Feel

rather than advanced spin control.

My slight advantage here goes to:

Callaway Supersoft

because its distance performance is particularly strong at lower speeds.

But SpeedSoft Ink may appeal more if visibility and personality are important.

38. Which Is Better for Beginners?

Again:

both.

A beginner does not necessarily need a $55 Tour golf ball.

If several balls disappear per round, it makes sense to prioritise:

  • Affordability
  • Durability
  • Predictability

Both SpeedSoft and Supersoft satisfy those requirements.

I would let:

price + feel + visual preference

make the final decision.

39. Which Is Better for Seniors?

Golf balls should not be fitted according to age alone.

But many senior golfers have moderate swing speeds and value:

  • Soft feel
  • Easy distance
  • Comfortable feedback

That makes both models logical candidates.

Based on low-speed distance testing:

Supersoft gets a slight edge.

40. Which Is Better for Women?

The same principle applies.

Gender doesn’t determine golf-ball fit.

Swing characteristics do.

A moderate-speed golfer who prioritises soft feel and value can benefit from either ball regardless of gender.

The extensive:

  • Matte
  • Ink
  • Splatter

options may also appeal to golfers who value visibility and identification.

41. Which Is Better in Cold Weather?

Soft golf balls can be particularly appealing in colder conditions because:

  • Impact feels firmer when temperatures fall
  • Golf balls generally become less resilient in cold conditions
  • Players often appreciate a softer-feeling construction

Both are therefore strong cold-weather options.

I would give:

SpeedSoft

a slight feel advantage because it starts from such an exceptionally soft baseline.

42. Which Is Better in the Wind?

Both have low-spin characteristics.

That can help minimise excessive ballooning.

Supersoft’s particularly low-spin profile may provide an advantage for golfers who naturally spin the ball too much.

But don’t automatically assume:

lowest spin = best wind ball.

You still need sufficient aerodynamic lift.

For low-speed golfers, excessively low spin can reduce carry.

43. Which Ball Flies Higher?

This depends on swing speed.

Independent testing shows that SpeedSoft’s relative flight position changes with speed.

At low iron speeds, it can fly relatively high.

At mid iron speeds, it tested among the lower-flying balls.

Supersoft has also produced relatively low trajectories in some testing while generating useful distance.

Therefore I would not award either a universal “higher flight” crown.

Your own delivery is too influential.

44. Which Ball Goes Farther?

Based on the current independent test evidence:

Callaway Supersoft

gets the advantage.

But the advantage depends strongly on swing speed.

At lower driver speed, the case is particularly strong.

At higher speeds, neither ball is likely to maximise total distance compared with firmer alternatives.

45. Which Ball Spins More?

Driver

Both:

Low

Supersoft:

often exceptionally low

Edge: Supersoft for maximum spin reduction.

Irons

Both:

relatively low

Result: Close.

Short Wedges

Both:

low

Result: Neither.

If you need high wedge spin:

buy a urethane-covered ball instead.

46. SpeedSoft vs Supersoft Head-to-Head Scorecard

CategorySpeedSoftSupersoft
Soft Feel★★★★★★★★★½
Driver Ball Speed★★★★☆★★★★½
Low-Speed Driver Distance★★★★☆★★★★★
Mid-Speed Iron Distance★★★★☆★★★★★
Driver Spin Reduction★★★★½★★★★★
Iron Stopping Power★★★☆☆★★★☆☆
Greenside Spin★★½☆☆★★½☆☆
Putting Feel★★★★★★★★★½
Durability★★★★★★★★★★
Visual Appeal★★★★★★★★★★
Colour Choice★★★★½★★★★★
Value★★★★★★★★★½
Overall4.3/54.4/5

47. TheRightGolfBall.com Decision Matrix

Your PriorityBetter Choice
Softest possible feelSpeedSoft
Low-speed driver distanceSupersoft
Mid-speed iron distanceSupersoft
Very low driver spinSupersoft
Lowest standard priceSpeedSoft
Most distinctive graphicsSpeedSoft Ink
Widest colour selectionSupersoft
Putting softnessSpeedSoft
Slightly more feedbackSupersoft
DurabilityTie
Greenside spinNeither
Beginner useTie
High-handicap useSupersoft by a small margin
Fun/style factorSpeedSoft Ink

48. The Three-Question Fitting Test

If you’re still undecided, answer three questions.

Question 1: What Matters More—Feel or Distance?

Feel:

Choose SpeedSoft.

Distance:

Choose Supersoft.

Question 2: Do You Need High Greenside Spin?

Yes:

Choose neither.

Look at a urethane model such as:

  • TaylorMade Tour Response
  • Callaway Chrome Soft

No:

Continue.

Question 3: Which One Do You Prefer Visually?

Paint-splatter / modern:

Choose SpeedSoft Ink.

Matte / Splatter 360 / broad colour choice:

Choose Supersoft.

At this price and performance level, visual preference is a perfectly legitimate tiebreaker.

49. Player Profile A: 80 MPH Driver Speed

  • Driver speed: 80 mph
  • Wants maximum distance
  • Doesn’t generate much short-game spin intentionally
  • Likes very soft feel

Recommendation:

Callaway Supersoft

Independent data gives it a compelling low-speed distance case.

50. Player Profile B: 90 MPH Driver Speed

  • Driver speed: 90 mph
  • Values softness above everything
  • Plays a firm-faced putter
  • Loses 2–3 balls per round

Recommendation:

TaylorMade SpeedSoft

The exceptionally soft feel and slightly lower price make considerable sense.

51. Player Profile C: 100 MPH Driver Speed

  • Driver speed: 100 mph
  • Wants affordable golf balls
  • Doesn’t care about wedge spin
  • Likes low spin off the tee

Recommendation:

Test both.

Supersoft may provide slightly greater speed.

But feel and launch conditions could easily determine the winner.

52. Player Profile D: 110 MPH Driver Speed

  • Driver speed: 110 mph
  • Wants maximum distance
  • Plays competitive golf
  • Requires wedge control

Recommendation:

Neither.

This golfer should probably test firmer urethane balls instead.

53. Player Profile E: 20-Handicap Recreational Golfer

  • Loses golf balls regularly
  • Plays once per week
  • Wants soft feel
  • Doesn’t own a launch monitor
  • Doesn’t deliberately manipulate wedge spin

Recommendation:

Either.

Choose according to price and feel.

There is no need to overcomplicate the decision.

54. Is Supersoft Worth Paying Slightly More?

Potentially.

The difference in standard retail price is relatively small.

Supersoft’s stronger independent distance results arguably justify a modest premium.

But sales change regularly.

If SpeedSoft is:

$20

and Supersoft is:

$28

then SpeedSoft may become the better value.

Always compare current prices rather than relying on MSRP alone.

55. Is SpeedSoft Ink Worth More Than Standard SpeedSoft?

Performance-wise:

No major difference.

You’re primarily paying for the graphic treatment.

But if the design helps you:

  • Find your ball
  • Identify it
  • Track it
  • Enjoy the game

then the additional cost may be worthwhile.

Golf doesn’t have to be purely about launch-monitor efficiency.

56. When Should You Upgrade From Either Ball?

Your game may eventually outgrow the performance profile.

Consider moving to a urethane ball when you begin noticing:

  • Too much rollout on pitches
  • Difficulty holding firm greens
  • Lack of wedge check
  • Inconsistent partial-shot control

That means your priorities have changed.

The logical upgrades are:

From SpeedSoft:

TaylorMade Tour Response

From Supersoft:

Callaway Chrome Soft

Those balls retain relatively soft feel while providing substantially more short-game control.

57. Launch-Monitor Test Protocol

If possible, compare SpeedSoft and Supersoft using:

Driver

Record:

  • Ball speed
  • Launch
  • Spin
  • Peak height
  • Carry
  • Total
  • Dispersion

7-Iron

Record:

  • Ball speed
  • Launch
  • Spin
  • Height
  • Carry
  • Descent angle

50-Yard Wedge

Record:

  • Launch
  • Spin
  • Carry
  • Rollout

Then test:

Putting

Ask which sound and feel you prefer.

58. Don’t Judge Them on One Perfect Drive

This is particularly important for recreational golfers.

Suppose:

SpeedSoft longest drive:

245 yards

Supersoft longest drive:

249 yards

It looks like Supersoft wins.

But if the averages are:

SpeedSoft:

242 yards

Supersoft:

238 yards

SpeedSoft was actually more effective for you.

Always compare:

  • Average carry
  • Average total distance
  • Dispersion

rather than one hero shot.

59. Frequently Asked Questions

Is TaylorMade SpeedSoft softer than Callaway Supersoft?

Both are extremely soft. SpeedSoft has a sub-50 compression design and tends to produce an especially muted sensation, so golfers seeking maximum softness may prefer it.

Which is longer, SpeedSoft or Supersoft?

Independent testing gives Callaway Supersoft a slight overall advantage, particularly at lower driver speeds and with mid-speed irons.

Which is faster off the driver?

In MyGolfSpy’s 2025 test, Supersoft generated slightly more ball speed than SpeedSoft at fast, medium and slow driver speeds.

Is the difference in driver speed large?

No.

The difference was relatively small, particularly at low speed.

Which spins less?

Both are low-spin golf balls. Supersoft was among the lowest-spin balls in independent testing, giving it a slight advantage for golfers deliberately seeking very low spin.

Which spins more around the green?

Neither is a high-spin short-game ball.

Both use non-urethane cover constructions and produce considerably less greenside spin than premium Tour balls.

Is SpeedSoft good for slow swing speeds?

Yes.

Its very soft construction, low spin and useful distance make it well suited to many slow-to-moderate-speed golfers.

Is Supersoft good for slow swing speeds?

Yes.

Independent testing has shown particularly strong total driver distance at lower speeds.

Which is better for high handicappers?

Both are good choices. Supersoft gets a slight advantage for distance, while SpeedSoft may appeal more to golfers prioritising feel and value.

Which is better for beginners?

Either.

Their affordable pricing, durability and soft feel suit beginner golfers extremely well.

Which is better for seniors?

Neither should be chosen purely based on age, but Supersoft’s strong low-speed distance performance makes it particularly attractive for golfers whose swing speed has decreased.

Which is better for women?

Either can work. Golf-ball fitting should be based on swing characteristics and performance rather than gender.

Which feels better with a putter?

SpeedSoft feels especially muted. Supersoft provides a little more responsive feedback. Personal preference should decide this category.

What is SpeedSoft Ink?

SpeedSoft Ink is TaylorMade’s colourful splatter-style version of SpeedSoft. It provides the same basic performance characteristics with a much more distinctive visual appearance.

What colours does Supersoft come in?

Callaway offers Supersoft in white, yellow and numerous matte and Splatter 360 versions, along with periodic limited editions.

Are these balls good in the wind?

Their low-spin profiles can help golfers who otherwise generate too much spin, although golfers with already-low spin need enough aerodynamic lift to preserve carry.

Can a fast swinger use SpeedSoft or Supersoft?

Yes, but faster golfers who prioritise maximum performance should compare them against firmer balls. Independent testing suggests very soft constructions can sacrifice meaningful driver distance at high speed.

Final Verdict: SpeedSoft or Supersoft?

This is one of the closest comparisons in the value golf-ball category.

Both products understand their target market exceptionally well.

They aren’t designed to satisfy Tour professionals.

They are designed for ordinary golfers who want:

  • Soft feel
  • Good distance
  • Durable construction
  • Low spin
  • Accessible pricing

TaylorMade SpeedSoft’s strongest argument is:

feel.

Its sub-50 compression and PWRCORE produce an exceptionally soft sensation throughout the bag.

Add the distinctive SpeedSoft Ink designs and it becomes one of the most characterful golf balls available around the $25 price point.

Callaway Supersoft’s strongest argument is:

performance efficiency.

Independent testing shows slightly higher driver ball speeds and impressive distance at slower speeds.

Its mid-speed iron distance is also excellent.

That gives it a slight overall performance advantage.

But both carry exactly the same major compromise:

greenside spin.

If you demand Tour-level wedge control, neither is the correct ball.

You need urethane.

If you don’t need that level of spin, however, there is a compelling argument for keeping your money in your pocket.

Choose TaylorMade SpeedSoft If You:

✅ Want the softest possible sensation

✅ Prioritise feel over maximum ball speed

✅ Want low driver spin

✅ Like muted putting feedback

✅ Prefer SpeedSoft Ink graphics

✅ Want excellent durability

✅ Lose several golf balls per round

✅ Want to spend around $25 per dozen

✅ Don’t require maximum greenside spin

Choose Callaway Supersoft If You:

✅ Want very soft feel with slightly more feedback

✅ Prioritise low-speed driver distance

✅ Want excellent mid-speed iron distance

✅ Want exceptionally low spin

✅ Prefer a broad choice of colours

✅ Like matte or Splatter 360 designs

✅ Want a proven recreational golf ball

✅ Don’t require urethane-level greenside control

TheRightGolfBall.com Verdict

Best for Feel: TaylorMade SpeedSoft

Best for Driver Distance: Callaway Supersoft

Best for Iron Distance: Callaway Supersoft

Best for Greenside Spin: Neither

Best Visual Design: TaylorMade SpeedSoft Ink

Best Colour Selection: Callaway Supersoft

Best Value: TaylorMade SpeedSoft

Overall Winner: Callaway Supersoft – by a very small margin

Our overall scores:

TaylorMade SpeedSoft: 4.3/5

Callaway Supersoft: 4.4/5

Supersoft wins because its independent test performance provides a slightly stronger combination of:

speed + distance + soft feel.

But the gap is small enough that a golfer who strongly prefers SpeedSoft’s feel should have absolutely no hesitation choosing it.

Ultimately:

Choose Supersoft for performance.

Choose SpeedSoft for maximum softness and personality.

And if your short game has developed to the point where neither provides enough control?

That is probably the signal to move into a urethane golf ball.

And for even more information the right golf ball for your game then make sure and try out our golf ball selector app which will help you narrow down the best golf ball for you.

Related Articles

TaylorMade SpeedSoft Golf Ball Review
Callaway Supersoft Golf Ball Review
Srixon Soft Feel Golf Ball Review
Best Soft Feel Golf Balls
Best Low Compression Golf Balls
Best Golf Balls for Slow Swing Speeds
Golf Ball Fitting Guide
Best Golf Balls Guide
Golf Ball Reviews & Brand Comparisons

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,
Comments are closed.